deejay title

deejay title
Welcome! Deejay Brown has been blessed to have the opportunity to be apart of such an outstanding program!. Deejay secured a position as the Program Coordinator of UCI’s LGBT Resource Center. Deejay values authenticity, vulnerability and resiliency as themes that guide their personal and professional practice. Deejay would like to thank their family, friends, faculty, mentors and cohort in their commitment to my supporting them in their education.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Fall 2013 Fieldwork Experience Refelction

E-Portfolio Entry
Activity Name & Description: Fall Fieldwork Reflection
My fieldwork site will be the University of California, Irvine’s LGBT Resource Center. The Resource Center is apart of the Student Life and Leadership Office. I will be enacting out my new role as the Program Coordinator for the Resource Center. As noted in my program description for my position, the Program Coordinator for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Resource Center (LGBTRC) is responsible for coordinating campus-wide programs, networking with campus offices and community resources, as well as the daily management of programs and services at the LGBTRC. Coordination of campus-wide programs including lecture and film series, LGBT theme weeks, Safe Zone program, Lavender Celebration, and the annual Outlist. Coordinate, design, delivery, and evaluate LGBTRC sponsored workshops and presentations. Develop funding proposals, monitor program budgets, coordinate publicity, set project timelines, and involve campus and community organizations as appropriate. 

Participate in the selection, training, and supervision of student interns, peers, office volunteers, safe zone facilitators, and speaker bureau volunteers. Supervise production of the Center web page and other materials for publicity. Provide student support, advocacy, crisis intervention, and referrals to campus and community resources. Assist campus departments in the development of supportive and safe environments for all students. This position reports directly to the Director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Resource Center.

My experience also includes programming around education, advocacy, and building community for not only LGBTQQIA students and allies, but the larger campus community. I have the ability to tailor programming the needs of the students and I am willing to adapt in any way to serve those in need. As a leader, I can confidently work with staff and volunteers when needed to collaborate on programming that is relevant to our diverse LGBTQQIA community.  I also assisted with the development of ideas for special promotional events and have worked closely with my supervisor to budget events that empower, celebrate and affirm LGBTQQIA culture in everyday life.

My practice informs me creating a rapport with students and assist in establishing a center on campus that’s programming that will expand students’ understanding of LGBTQ issues and creating a safe space for all students.

I was prepared through the study of gender and sexuality, insights, knowledge, and interpretive frameworks that have equipped me, personally, intellectually, and professionally. I examined how gender and sexuality as social constructs shape individual lives, groups, institutions, and social structures. I researched how gender and sexuality intersect with race, culture, ethnicity, and social class in the interest of social justice.

Strengths: Strengths: Strategic, Empathy, Connectedness,Input, Ideation.

a. Student will refashion personal beliefs and commitments in a way that is true to one’s own self while recognizing the contributions of important others (e.g., self, peers, family, or one or more larger communities).
b. Student will be able to gain an understanding amd develop effective advising, counseling and rapport skills when working with student interns.
c. Student will work with director and student interns to develop supervision skills when working with student staff.

(Learning Goal) Student will be able to gain an understanding amd develop effective advising, counseling and rapport skills when working with student interns.
Date/Semester
December 2013 (Fall Semester)

Learning Domains Addressed (Labels)

X Leadership
X Social Justice & Advocacy
X Education

X Personal Development

Learning Outcomes
 SWiBAT spend 200 hours at Fieldwork Site.
SWiBAT  apply knowledge from fieldwork experience and create a reflection piece.

Evidence (Shown in Essay)




Fieldwork Experience at an LGBT Resource Center
EDAD 568: Fieldwork
Darrell (Deejay) Brown
California State University, Fullerton




Fall 2013 Fieldwork Setting and Learning Outcomes 
My Fall 2013 fieldwork site was working at the University of California, Irvine’s Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) Resource Center.  The LGBT Resource Center is a part of the Student Life and Leadership Office.   I started my new role as the Program Coordinator for the Resource Center at the beginning of August.  My position as the Program Coordinator for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Resource Center is coordinating campus-wide programs, networking with campus offices and community resources, as well as the daily management of programs and services at the LGBTRC.   
My position involves the coordination of campus-wide programs includes lecture and film series, LGBT theme weeks, Safe Zone program, Lavender Celebration, and the annual Outlist.   I will coordinate, design, deliver, and evaluate LGBTRC sponsored workshops and presentations.   I will develop funding proposals, monitor program budgets, coordinate publicity, set project timelines, and involve campus and community organizations as appropriate.   I will participate in the selection, training, and supervision of student interns, peers, office volunteers, safe zone facilitators, and speaker bureau volunteers.   I will also supervise production of the Center web page and other materials for publicity provide student support, advocacy, crisis intervention, and referrals to campus and community resources.   I will assist campus departments in the development of supportive and safe environments for all students.   In this position I report directly to the Director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Resource Center, David Bishop and Sherwynn Umali, the Associate Dean of Students.  As a new professional, I bring in many different skills and competencies that I feel are very relevant both to my professional position but also to my fieldwork experience.

Broader Goal and Learning Outcomes 
As a new professional, I bring in many different skills and competencies that I feel are very relevant both to my professional position but also to my fieldwork experience.  My larger thematic goal was to learn more skills as a professional supervisor.  I also wanted to utilize student development theory and incorporate theory into my practice.  My learning outcome was to able to demonstrate increased skill in advising, counseling, and establishing rapport with student interns.  To reach this goal, I planned not only to meet with student interns, but work with them to collaborate relationships and create opportunities for learning experienes.  Not only would I supervise the students, I would be able to help advise them and create spaces for learning experiences.  My learning outcomes were formed so that I could develop skills with accepting feedback from my site supervisor, but also from my student interns and students that frequent the center.
To accomplish this broad learning objective, I developed two project outcomes: (1) create an ongoing training manual for student staff; (2) design a weekly action plan for weekly staff meetings and one-on-one student staff meetings.

Intentional and Unintentional Learning Outcomes 
To complete the initial project objective, I was able to develop and work with the existing training manual and to utilize this manual in the student intern retreat.  I was able to add many additions to training manual, and was able to work with my supervisor to develop a summer training that complimented both of our programming styles.  In the training manual, I was able to shift out outdated policies and draft new policies that would better serve our supervisory styles as Director and Program Coordinator.  After meetings with my site supervisor, I was able to draft changes that would also benefit the students to better understand the larger purposes of the center and our vision of what these positions would do to benefit the larger campus climate as it related to the LGBTQ student community.  Both of these messages were integrated into the manual and through the student intern retreat.  After the training, I received a variety of feedback from interns and my site supervisor.  In these conversations, I learned that I was able to deliver a warm, experience where students were able to understand my role as a supervisor.  Through the use of many icebreakers and scheduling the training in different modules, the student interns were able to understand the vision of the center and their each individual position.       
To complete the second project outcome, I was able to design a weekly action plan for my student intern one-on-ones.  To draft this action plan, I asked key questions to my site supervisor and other supervisors in Student Life and Leadership.  From these one-on-ones, I was able to utilize their feedback to create an organized action plan that I was able to utilize in my meetings with my interns.  I would have liked to utilize them every week in our sessions, but many of the intended formal sessions became bi-weekly and often consisted of working with them in the Center, rather than in my office.  I actually feel that this was more beneficial to the productivity of the space and I believe after reflecting on this action plan it would be better to have been done on a monthly basis.
     
Unexpected Outcomes 
Unexpectedly, I spent much of my fieldwork assignment cultivating my skills at relationship building with multiple students both on staff and those that frequented the center.  I spent roughly seven to ten hours a week working with students outside of my staff discussing a variety of issues that were important to their growth and development.  Working with many students that were questioning their identities, I was able to use Rendón’s (1994) theory of Validation and Baxter Magolda’s theory of self-authorship (2001) to create a partnership where we could work together as they were able to express their wants, needs and desires as college students while working on cultivating an authentic identity.  Most of my intentions in our one-on-one sessions was to instill in them that each one of them mattered, and that I would be there to support them and build a sense of self-esteem.
            Unintentionally, I also learned more about myself as a professional.  I learned a variety of skills that I felt were related to cultivating my success as a Program Coordinator.  I learned initially that I must learn more organizational skills to be able to meet the demands of my position as well as spend valuable time with students both interns and those that used the space to find support.  I also had to spend a lot of time managing priorities and find a way to balance both of my roles as a supervisor and as an advisor.  I learned that there is always more work to be done to meet the needs of the students that I serve on a daily basis.  I also learned how important it is to create space to meet manage my other schedule in regards to my role as a programmer where I needed time to act creatively to create programming where I could facilitate new programs where students could learn and could cultivate a sense of community.
        It was extremely important for me to use theory in my professional practice as I made the transition from paraprofessional staff to professional full-time staff member.  Out of this experience I was able to utilize multiple student development theories: among them were Baxter-Magolda’s (2012) learning partnerships model where I would help develop learning partnerships with my student interns and students.  It was important for me to develop these partnerships; where we could work together to cultivate where they were on their academic journeys; where we could work together to solve problems and come up with solutions.
            I was able to incorporate the Model of Multiple Dimensions of Identity (Jones & McEwan, 2000) into my work.  As an identity-based center, it was important for me to value the many different identities that students hold and be extra considerate of how students see themselves.  I must assess how I can be useful in listening and providing feedback that would be beneficial to what they feel is important and valuable to their identities. 
Lastly, I utilized Rendón’s (1994) theory of Validation and Schlossberg’s (1989) theory of Mariginality and Mattering to work with students to create supportive environments in our one-on-one advising and supervising meetings.  I greeted each student in a special way, let him or her know my intentions of why I wanted them to know that they were important and that their stories mattered to me.  In our meetings, I made sure to provide affirming words as well as let them know that they are worthy to the center and to this university, even if they felt that the did not matter.  It was my highest intention to facilitate a space, where they knew that they mattered, felt important and were appreciated.

Evaluation and Reflection of the site experience
            As I reflect on my site experience, I found that it was extremely valuable to acclimate to a new working environment.  I felt that this experience and the culture of the department of Student Life and Leadership made it easier to be an authentic practitioner.  I felt that the department was a family rather than feeling like a business.  From professional attire, to the interactions with my co-workers, this felt like a setting that was welcoming, inviting and inclusive.  I felt free to come into my own in this space and every professional was willing and excited to offer advice.  In terms of training and orientation, I received a few weeks of adjusting to the office, learning the role of my new position and how I could plan for the Fall quarter.  During that time, I became acquainted with key players of the department as well as various policies related to the center and the office. 
It was extremely valuable to have the experience working with a supervisor that helped support me as I learned understand my role and establish a professional identity.  It was also very valuable to work with the Associate Dean of Students to understand how they utilized student development theory and was able to offer me tips and pointers to establish a professional identity.  I was able to learn so much about why it is important to be authentic.  I also learned the valuable lesson of taking ownership of my position. 
            I would highly recommend both the LGBT Resource Center and the Student Life and Leadership Office.  Many of my colleagues in the department are very interested to work with graduate students and have a variety of projects that students can contribute to their learning skills that would attribute to their growth as professionals. 

Future Areas of Growth

When I began my fieldwork, I felt that I brought many different skills and competencies that I feel are very relevant both to my professional position but also to my fieldwork experience.  This position has given me an awakening of how hard it is as a new professional to develop a work-life balance.  This experience has given me an opportunity to understand how demanding and how awarding this particular field is.  Many days I have left work mentally exhausted but I left satisfied knowing that I did indeed make a difference in creating space for students to grow and develop. 
            I feel that I have learned more about how I need to develop my own self-care plan so that I can too come into each and every day revitalized.  When I hear many students that I work with experience micro-aggressions on a daily basis regarding their identities or expression I must be resilient and share my experiences in order to offer narratives and ways that they too can feel nurtured. 
            I believe balance, self-care, and wellness are three major areas of growth that will help me move into a place where I can continue to understand my own identity as a reflective-scholar practitioner.  After this fieldwork experience, I have learned that I have to continue to find a balance so that I can better serve the students that I work with without the fear of burnout.  I need to work on my resilience skills so that I can deal with the daily struggles that a professional may face with working with a vulnerable and resilient community without leaving work carrying the weight on my shoulders.  I believe this fieldwork experience has let me know exactly the kind of professional I want to become.  I will continue to find a balance between living my passion of helping and serving students; while also developing a life to continue to learn, grow and develop.











Resources

Baxter Magolda, M.  B.  (2001).  Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher
education to promote self-development.  Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Baxter-Magolda, M.  B.  (2012).  Building learning partnerships.  Change magazine, Retrieved
from http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back Issues/2012/January-February 2012/learning-partnerships-full.html

Jones, S., & McEwan, K.  (2000).  A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of
identity.  Journal of College Student Development, 41(4), 405-414.  Retrieved from: http://emergentrecovery.com/uploads/Conceptual_Model_of_Multiple_Dimensions_of_Identity.pdf

Rendón, L.  I.  (1994).  Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of
learning and student development.  Innovative Higher Education, 19, 33–51.

Schlossberg, N.  K.  (1989).  Marginality and mattering: Key issues in building community.  In
D. 
C.  Roberts (Ed.), Designing campus activities to foster a sense of community (pp.  5–15).  New
Directions for Student Services, No.  48.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


Reflection

I feel that “I am coming into myself” as I begin to understand myself as a professional.  I am more aware of my strengths and weaknesses as a professional and I will continue to reflect, assess and grow from these weaknesses and turn them into strengths.  I have learned so much about the kind of roles that I must navigate between.  At times I must be the scholar, the supervisor, the programmer, the assistant director, the role model, the “model professional.” This journey has been exhausting, but everyday leave my work,  I am exhausted but also very satisfied with this practice.  This semester, I have learned to assess my own actions, values, beliefs and attitudes as a professional and make sure that I am intentional in creating experiences where students are able to learn and develop.  Even with all of the inertia in my own life, I can feel that I am making a difference.   



Personal Vision of Instructional Leadership

E-Portfolio Entry
Activity Name & Description: Personal Vision of Instructional Leadership
In the Fall Quarter 2013, I will develop a personal Vision of Instructional Leadership, I will apply what I’ve learned in coursework and apply my vision to a Student Affairs Position that I am interested in.

Date/Semester
December 2013 (Fall Semester)

Learning Domains Addressed (Labels)

X Leadership
X Social Justice & Advocacy
X Education

X Personal Development

Learning Outcomes
 SWiBAT develop personal vision of instructional leadership.
SWiBAT  apply knowledge from various coursework to develop an essay.
Assessment Rubric



Rubric: Instructional Leader Role

SLO #1 – Role as an Instructional Leader
Advanced
I will be able to identify 5 examples of what it means to be an instructional leader.
Competent
I will be able to identify 3 examples of what it means to be an instructional leader.
Basic
I will be able to identify 2 examples of what it means to be an instructional leader.
Poor
I will not identify any examples of what it means to be an instructional leader.

Evidence (Shown in Essay)














Personal Vision of Instructional Leadership
Deejay Brown
EDAD 505
California State University, Fullerton






ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to describe my philosophy as an instructional and educational leader in Higher Education.  Utilizing this vision I will develop, articulate and design a program as instructional leader in an imagined position.  This paper will articulate how my vision of an instructional leader can be utilized in developing programming as a Director of a Multicultural Resource Center.  Based on this position, I will provide recommendations and goals that seek to create student learning and development for all students. 





There are many different responsibilities that student affairs practitioners must take on as instructional and educational leaders.  The valuable leadership they bring to the institution of Higher Education informs these roles.  Like their counterparts in academic affairs; student affairs professionals are also centered in student learning and development.  “Student Affairs must model what we wish for our students: an ever increasing capacity for learning and self-reflection” (American College Personnel Association, 1994).  Student affairs practitioners must be educational leaders that continually develop their own philosophies and must be initially concerned with our own learning and development, apart of this work is to define our own philosophies of educational and instructional leaderships so that we can better serve our students.  This portion of this essay will describe my philosophy and vision as an instructional leader. 
Initially, we are called to be co-facilitators with members of faculty to initiate holistic learning that is rooted in scholarship.  We must be intentional and hold ourselves accountable by developing learning outcomes in our program and service areas.  We must program with purpose, design in such a way that creates learning opportunities for the myriad of the students that we serve.
In curriculum development and design, we must work with our partners in academic affairs to situate learning experiences wherever our students are present from the formal classroom setting to where we provide programming and services, these are all spaces that provide opportunities for students to grow.  Authors Woolf & Hughes describe curriculum as “a coherent program of study that is responsive to the needs and circumstances of the pedagogical context and is carefully designed to develop student’s knowledge, abilities, and skills through multiple integrated and progressively challenging course learning experiences.” (Woolf & Hughes, 2007, p.7).   As an instructional leader, I want to work with other instructional leaders to develop programming that creates student-centered learning experiences at its core.
I also believe as a student affairs practitioner, that we are educators because our programing is focused on student learning and development.  Reflective Scholar Practitioners are academics informed by scholarship and theory.  Our work is not arbitrary; it is tied to our formal education and our experiences as practitioners.  Our programming like academic coursework is centered on student learning outcomes.  These learning outcomes are one way that we can measure that learning does occur in our programming.  Many of us are also members of academic affairs.  Many instructional leaders bridge between academic affairs and student affairs.  My philosophy of leadership focuses on intentionality, using what I have learned both in my work as a scholar and as a practitioner.  I want to act as a change agent, aligning my work with my character and values.  I want my work as instructional leader to be meaningful, engaging and I want to compliment what students learn in the classroom. 

Context and Application
            Initially, I would like to imagine myself as a Director of a newly created Multicultural Resource Center.  I chose this position because it is a position that I am currently interested in becoming in my future as a practitioner.  I have learned that much of its work is grounded in holistic identity development that is centered on raising cultural awareness for the larger campus community. 
My plan as a reflective scholar practitioner is to bridge the gap in academic affairs to work from a interdisciplinary perspective; where what is modeled in the classroom can be bridged in identity development.  As I imagine myself as an instructional leader in a Multicultural Center, I hope to work with faculty from a wide variety of disciplines.  I feel there are natural partnerships that reflect many missions of Multicultural Affairs and Programs, initially I would like to reach out to the college of humanities and various academic departments such as: sociology, race and ethnic studies departments, American studies, women and queer studies departments.  I believe an interdisciplinary approach would create stronger bonds not only between student affairs and academic affairs, but I believe they would strengthen the scholarship in programming that would attract a wide variety of students that typically may not think about their own identities.
Multicultural Student Programs and Services offer a variety of roles on college campuses, the Council of Academic Standards in Higher Education (CAS) asserts that “Strong MSPS are essential to the academic and social integration and, thus retention and graduation rates of students as well the multicultural education of the campus” (CAS, 2012, p.361).  It is my hope as an instructional leader that I am able to use this service area as means to promote success for all students.  It is my charge to use this space to advocate for the many different needs students bring with them when they arrive to college.  I want to create a space to validate all of these needs; but I am especially concerned with those that are often underrepresented in most institutions of Higher Education.   
There are many different visions that Multicultural Centers and offices can embody on college campuses, CAS defines one such mission of this student service area where it seeks to “promote academic and personal growth of traditionally underserved students, work with the entire campus to create and institutional and community climate of justice, promote access and equity in higher education, and offer programs that educate the campus about diversity.” (CAS, p.363, 2012).   I believe as an instructional leader that I must create spaces across many different service areas to reflect the mission of the multicultural center.  This work reflects my own values of instructional leadership, it seeks to create student centered learning, where they are able to grow personally and academically. 
As an instructional leader it is important to work with faculty to create opportunities for students to learn.  To reach our shared goal we must work collaboratively with faculty members to create relationships that reinforce both the themes in their academic coursework and those that also reflect vision of the centers and offices in student affairs.  It is my assertion that building this bridge will increase student success for all students because what they are learning is reinforced in and out of the classroom.   
Pascarella and Terenzini (2005) concluded, “student contact with faculty members outside the classroom appears consistently to promote student persistence, educational aspirations, and degree completion” (Pascarella & Terenzini, p.  417,2005).  Using the Multicultural Center as an out of the classroom space, students can bridge relationships with educators and can be a space to form bonds.  Using Multicultural Center programming as an intervention for promoting student-faculty involvement I believe we are creating spaces for students to feel that they matter and are taken care of.      
Yosso and Benavides Lopez (2010) assert, “to foster student achievement, culture centers draw upon various disciplines, from the humanities and social sciences to math, science, and engineering” (Yosso & Benavides Lopez, 2010, p.  98).  This aligns with my instructional philosophy of leadership and my imagined position of a Multicultural Center Director.  It is valuable to draw upon multiple educational perspectives and disciplines to attract the breadth of students who are involved in a variety of disciplines.  Yosso and Benavides Lopez (2010) continue to assert that these relationships can occur with departments or individual faculty members.  Working with faculty members in culture centers can have a wide variety of results, among them Yosso and Benivades Lopez (2010) assert that “these structured opportunities to apply knowledge outside the classroom and to engage in projects where students see themselves in history link the academy with the community” (Yosso & Benavides Lopez, 2010, pp.98-99).
As an instructional leader it is important to work with faculty to create opportunities for students to learn.  Both faculty and practitioners “share a critical common goal- advancing student intellectual and personal development” (Arecelus, p.71, 2007).To reach our shared goal we must work collaboratively with faculty members to create relationships that reinforce both the themes in their academic coursework and those that also reflect vision of the centers and offices in student affairs.  It is my assertion that building this bridge will increase student success for all students because what they are learning is reinforced in and out of the classroom.   

Long and Short Term goals
Student Affairs practitioners McClellan & Stringer (2009) describe that there is an eroding boundary between academic affairs and student affairs as both share the common goal of creating spaces for students to learn.  McClellan & Stringer assert that these boundaries are eroding because these areas have a “shared emphasis on student learning, assessment, and accountability”(McCllelan & Stringer, p.631, 2009).   As a student affairs practitioner and an instructional leader, I believe that on-going assessment of the programs is necessary for improving student achievement.   In reflecting on the imagined position, I believe this assessment can happen in a number of ways that are both short and long term. 
In terms of short term planning, I would like to create an action committee that would visit other campuses and review other Multicultural Resource Centers and offices and research and gather feedback for best practices.  I believe this action committee must be comprised of a variety of stakeholders including students, administration, faculty; as well as stakeholders from the larger campus community.   I would like to initiate multiple meetings throughout the academic year, where we would bring in faculty and other stakeholders to discuss how the learning domains of the Multicultural Center would integrate with their present curriculum.  I believe it is important to also gather responses from students that are currently experiencing learning both in the classroom and the resource center environment.
To be accountable that our programming is student centered, I believe that we must create focus groups that meet at the end of each academic term.  I believe that we must take student input as cherished information to assess that our programming is student centered and is responsive to where students are in their own development.  Based on these quarterly assessments, the action committee can respond to the student voice in coursework and programming in the next academic year.  I believe this would be useful in furthering the program’s mission.
In terms of long term planning, it is my hope during these action committee meetings that we could begin to develop a strategic plan in which we could develop a united vision that would best serve our students, based on the core learning domains that reflect the co-curricular vision of student success, we could begin to create learning outcomes that reflect this vision.






Reference:

Arcelus, V.   J.   (2007).   If student affairs-academic affairs collaboration is such a good idea,
why are the so few examples of these partnerships in american higher education.   In P.   Magolda & M.   Baxter Magolda (Eds.), Contested issues in student affairs: Diverse perspectives and respectful dialogue.Sterling, VA: Stylus.

American College Personnel Association.  (1994).  The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs.  Washington, DC: Author.

Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.  (2012).  CAS professional standards for higher education (7th ed.).  Washington, DC: CAS 2012.

McClellan, G.S.  & Stringer, J.  and Associates (2009).  The Handbook of Student Affairs
Administration (5th Ed.).  New Jersey: Jossey Bass.

Wolf, P.   & Hughes, J.   C.    (Eds.).   (2007).   Educational curriculum development in higher
education :  Faculty driven processes and procedures.   (112).    San Francisco, CA : Wiley.     

Yosso, T., & Benavides Lopez, C.  (2010).  Counterspaces in hostile space.  In L.  Patton
(Ed.), Culture centers in higher education perspectives on identity:Theory and practice (pp.  98-99).  Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Reflection

            My role as an instructional leader offers something more than the stereotypical student affairs practitioner. It is about utilizing scholarship and developing learning outcomes that provide educational and developmental opportunities that benefit all students’ learning and development. I hope that I was able to articulate my experience as an educational and instructional leader.